Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 299385
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T06:49:05+00:00 2026-05-12T06:49:05+00:00

Purely out of curiosity, which browsers does Base64 image embedding work in? What I’m

  • 0

Purely out of curiosity, which browsers does Base64 image embedding work in? What I’m referring to is this.

I realize it’s not usually a good solution for most things, as it increases the page size quite a bit – I’m just curious.

Some examples:

HTML:

<img alt="Embedded Image" src="..." />

CSS:

div.image {
  width:100px;
  height:100px;
  background-image:url(...);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T06:49:05+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 6:49 am

    Update: 2017-01-10

    Data URIs are now supported by all major browsers. IE supports embedding images since version 8 as well.

    http://caniuse.com/#feat=datauri


    Data URIs are now supported by the following web browsers:

    • Gecko-based, such as Firefox, SeaMonkey, XeroBank, Camino, Fennec and K-Meleon
    • Konqueror, via KDE’s KIO slaves input/output system
    • Opera (including devices such as the Nintendo DSi or Wii)
    • WebKit-based, such as Safari (including on iOS), Android’s browser, Epiphany and Midori (WebKit is a derivative of Konqueror’s KHTML engine, but Mac OS X does not share the KIO architecture so the implementations are different), as well as Webkit/Chromium-based, such as Chrome
    • Trident
      • Internet Explorer 8: Microsoft has limited its support to certain “non-navigable” content for security reasons, including concerns that JavaScript embedded in a data URI may not be interpretable by script filters such as those used by web-based email clients. Data URIs must be smaller than 32 KiB in Version 8[3].
      • Data URIs are supported only for the following elements and/or attributes[4]:
        • object (images only)
        • img
        • input type=image
        • link
      • CSS declarations that accept a URL, such as background-image, background, list-style-type, list-style and similar.
      • Internet Explorer 9: Internet Explorer 9 does not have 32KiB limitation and allowed in broader elements.
      • TheWorld Browser: An IE shell browser which has a built-in support for Data URI scheme

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme#Web_browser_support

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is purely out of curiosity, but why does this occur? >>> a =
Disclaimer: this question is purely informational and does not represent an actual problem I'm
This question is purely out of curiosity. I am off school for the summer,
Note: purely out of curiosity and not for any actual use case. I'm wondering
These questions are purely asked out of curiosity. I don't actually need to subclass
I was (purely out of curiosity) trying to find out what the size of
Forewarning: a potentially silly question, purely out of curiosity. If, for example, I perform
This is a purely pedantic question, to sate my own curiosity. I tend to
I'm working on a Vista workstation purely out of stubbornness. Not that I like
A question purely for curiosity's sake. This is obviously invalid syntax: foo = {}

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.