Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8237283
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T19:25:22+00:00 2026-06-07T19:25:22+00:00

python generators are good replacements for lists in most cases expect where I would

  • 0

python generators are good replacements for lists in most cases expect where I would like to check for empty condition which is not possible with plain generators. I am trying to write a wrapper which will allow checking for empty condition but is still lazy and gives the benefit of generators.

class mygen:
  def __init__(self,iterable):
    self.iterable = (x for x in iterable)
    self.peeked = False
    self.peek = None
  def __iter__(self):
    if self.peeked:
      yield self.peek
      self.peeked = False
    for val in self.iterable:
      if self.peeked:
        yield self.peek
        self.peeked = False
      yield val
    if self.peeked:
      yield self.peek
      self.peeked = False
  def __nonzero__(self):
    if self.peeked:
      return True
    try:
      self.peek = self.iterable.next()
      self.peeked = True
      return True
    except:
      return False
  1. I think it behaves correctly like a plain generator. Is there any corner case
    I’m missing?
  2. This doesn’t look elegant. Is there a better more pythonic way of doing the same?

Sample usage:

def get_odd(l):
    return mygen(x for x in l if x%2)

def print_odd(odd_nums):
  if odd_nums:
      print "odd numbers found",list(odd_nums)
  else:
      print "No odd numbers found"

print_odd(get_odd([2,4,6,8]))
print_odd(get_odd([2,4,6,8,7]))
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T19:25:23+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 7:25 pm

    I would not usually implement this kind
    of generator. There is an idiomatic way how to test if a iterator it
    is exhausted:

    try:
        next_item = next(it)
    except StopIteration:
        # exhausted, handle this case
    

    Substituting this EAFP idiom by some project-specific LBYL idiom seems
    confusing and not beneficial at all.

    That said, here is how I would implement this if I really wanted to:

    class MyIterator(object):
        def __init__(self, iterable):
            self._iterable = iter(iterable)
            self._exhausted = False
            self._cache_next_item()
        def _cache_next_item(self):
            try:
                self._next_item = next(self._iterable)
            except StopIteration:
                self._exhausted = True
        def __iter__(self):
            return self
        def next(self):
            if self._exhausted:
                raise StopIteration
            next_item = self._next_item
            self._cache_next_item()
            return next_item
        def __nonzero__(self):
            return not self._exhausted
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to know how to write python function which can flatten generator
I would like to write a League Fixture generator in python, but I can't.
I hope this is not outside of the abilities of Python generators, but I'd
Is it a good practice to use exception for managing cases that are not
Python generators are very useful. They have advantages over functions that return lists. However,
I have a number of Python generators, which I want to combine into a
I'm writing a Python generator which looks like cat. My specific use case is
I'm familiar with Python generators, however I've just come across the term generative method
I just learnt about generators in Python a week back. From what I understood,
How do you make a repeating generator, like xrange, in Python? For instance, if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.