Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 887573
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T13:15:02+00:00 2026-05-15T13:15:02+00:00

Question: How could I rewrite the anonymous type syntax in the ActionLink to be

  • 0

Question: How could I rewrite the anonymous type syntax in the ActionLink to be a little more standard OOP? I’m trying to understand what is happening.

What I think it means is: Creating an object with a single property id, which is an int, equal to that of the DinnerID in item, which is a Dinner.

 <% foreach (var item in Model) { %>

        <tr>
            <td>
                <%: Html.ActionLink("Edit", "Edit", new { id=item.DinnerID }) %> |
                <%: Html.ActionLink("Details", "Details", new { id=item.DinnerID })%> |
                <%: Html.ActionLink("Delete", "Delete", new { id=item.DinnerID })%>
            </td>
            <td>
                <%: item.DinnerID %>
            </td>
            <td>
                <%: item.Title %>
            </td>

I think I get Anonymous types: Wrote what I think is happening under the hood.

class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            // Anonymous types provide a convenient way to encapsulate a set of read-only properties
            // into a single object without having to first explicitly define a type
            var person = new { Name = "Terry", Age = 21 };
            Console.WriteLine("name is " + person.Name);
            Console.WriteLine("age is " + person.Age.ToString());

            Person1 person1 = new Person1("Bill",55);
            Console.WriteLine("name is " + person1.Name);
            Console.WriteLine("age is " + person1.Age.ToString());

            //person1.Name = "test"; // this wont compile as the setter is inaccessible
        }
    }

    class Person1
    {
        public string Name { get; private set; }
        public int Age { get; private set; }

        public Person1(string name, int age)
        {
            Name = name;
            Age = age;
        }
    }

Many thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T13:15:03+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 1:15 pm

    That’s pretty much what it’s doing except that the properties of anonymous types have public setters, and the anonymous types have parameterless constructors.

    So a more accurate equivalent would be:

    class Person1 
    { 
        public string Name { get; set; } 
        public int Age { get; set; } 
    }
    
    Person1 person1 = new Person1 { Name = "Bill", Age = 55 };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.