Home/ Questions/Q 797167
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-14T22:45:34+00:00

Question: I currently store ASP.net application data in XML files. Now the problem is

  • 0

Question: I currently store ASP.net application data in XML files.

Now the problem is I have asynchronous operations, which means I ran into the problem of simultanous write access on a XML file…

Now, I’m considering moving to an embedded database to solve the issue.
I’m currently considering SQlite and embeddable Firebird.

I’m not sure however if SQlite or Firebird can handle multiple concurrent write access.
And I certainly don’t want the same problem again.
Anybody knows ?
SQlite certainly is better known, but which one is better – SQlite or Firebird ? I tend to say Firebird, but I don’t really know.

No MS-Access or MS-SQL-express recommodations please, I’m a sane person.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I wll choose Firebird for many reasons and for this too

    Although it is transactional, SQLite
    does not support concurrent
    transactions, so if your embedded
    application needs two or more
    connections, they must be serialized.
    An embedded Firebird database is
    simple to upgrade to a fully shared
    database – just change the shared
    library.

    May be you can also check this

    • 0