Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 852253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T07:33:50+00:00 2026-05-15T07:33:50+00:00

Question I wish to know if this is a viable way to implement variable

  • 0

Question
I wish to know if this is a viable way to implement variable depth recursion so that I can run a function at each step and any better/other solutions to the description problem.
Description
Suppose I wish to have a function that fills an array either in pattern
x,y,x,y,x,ywhere x and y are variables defined by some algorithm
and x,y,z,x,y,z where x, y and z are variables defined by the same algorithm.

This should continue for all number of variables. Is this a viable way to implement it.

void recurse_n(int n)
{
    while(n > 0)
    {
        --n;
        recurse_n(n);
        n = 0;
        // Use algorithm here
    }
}

EDIT: Removed the incorrect return type previously referred to. Brainfart.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T07:33:50+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:33 am

    So, based on your comment you want to know the best way to set up a recursive function. What you have done will work, but it is convoluted and slightly confusing. What I would do to simplify it is:

    void recurse_n(int n) {
        if (n <= 0) {
            // Break-out condition
            return;
        }
    
        --n;
        recurse_n(n);
    
        // Your algorithm stuff here.
    }
    

    That will make it easier to see what is going on. One thing I would add though is that you might want to do the algorithm stuff before the call to recurse_n, but that all depends on what your algorithm is doing.

    If you think about it, the way I have written it, it will recurse until n is less than or equal to 0 before doing any of the algorithm work. It might be that you want to do the algorithm work then recurse.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 498k
  • Answers 498k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to call selenium.getEval(). The signature of that call… May 16, 2026 at 12:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I suspect your problem is that by using the []… May 16, 2026 at 12:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Basically you need a server (well, you don't NEED a… May 16, 2026 at 12:10 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I wish to know is there any way that I can create the threads
I wish to know if i can catch the unhandled exceptions thrown by another
First off, I know this may be a very stupid question, so don't shoot
I wish to include the call stack (e.g. the methods that called me) in
I wish to know which one is responsible for cleanup of the stack Suppose
I wish to know if .Net-3.5 comes with a built-in List<string> or string[] TypeConverter
I wish to know what type of objects I've got in my environment. I
Really wish i was God, then I would understand what this means: The element
I wish to add a singleton method to a particular object. I wish that
I wish to upload from my Flash Application (AS3) to imageshacks XML API. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.