Home/ Questions/Q 6896773
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-27T07:05:10+00:00

Question If you’ve used RequireJS with a Rails 3 (esp 3.1) app, how is

  • 0

Question

If you’ve used RequireJS with a Rails 3 (esp 3.1) app, how is that working for you? Any configuration tricks or other gotchas that I need to watch out for?

Background

I’m contemplating using RequireJS over the Sprockets-based Asset Pipeline in Rails 3.1, specifically for JavaScript code. I have two motivators for this choice:

  • I want to leverage RequireJS’ module management for my JS client-side code.
  • I’d like a precompilation system that can follow my JS library code into other contexts. To my surprise, the Asset Pipeline precompiler is a baked-in part of Rails, not a part of Sprockets itself.

All feedback appreciated, thanks!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    For posterity, here’s where I’ve come to on this question:

    • RequireJS provides an implementation of the Asynchronous Module Definition API. RequireJS’ Why AMD? page lays out the case as to why you’d want to use this.

    • Sprockets and the Rails 3 Asset Pipeline allow for simple structuring of JavaScript/CoffeeScript code, but don’t provide any true module support. For example, there’s no namespace control whatsoever in Sprockets.

    • jQuery (as of 1.7), Underscore, Dojo and numerous other major libraries have implemented AMD support. Several other major JS libraries seem to have AMD support on the near-term horizion (e.g. Backbone.js).

    It’s certainly possible to create a Rails app that integrates RequireJS. To simplify that process, I’ve created the requirejs-rails gem on github, with straightforward configuration and Asset Pipeline-aware precompilation for AMD-based code via r.js. The current release is available via:

    gem install requirejs-rails

    • 0