Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 213295
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:15:55+00:00 2026-05-11T18:15:55+00:00

Question: I’m interested to know the best practice for killing a long standing operation

  • 0

Question: I’m interested to know the best practice for killing a long standing operation that is running as a background thread (lets call this thread WorkerThread) in Java 1.2.

Scenario

Specifically, I’m developing an application for Blackberry devices whereby I make a HTTP connection. Big picture: a URL request if forwarded to a background thread (WorkerThread), the thread makes the request and returns the result using a call back.

Scenario Details

Now there exists a situation where at connection time, a data connection exists but then for whatever reason (drives through a tunnel) that connection no longer exists. Due to a limitation in Blackberry’s design architecture, that actual connection will hang as the time out is fixed to be 2 minutes. As a result, there’s a crucial need to kill a connection that has been hanging for a relatively (15 seconds) long period of time.

My Current Solution – 2 Theads?

Right now my current solution is to run WorkerThread inside another thread (lets call this new thread MonitorThead). MonitorThread starts WorkerThread, sleeps for 1000ms and then routinely checks if WorkerThread is still alive. If after 15 seconds WorkerThread is still alive, MonitorThread puts WorkerThread to sleep and exits. Is this really the best possible approach?

Summary of Question & Key points

In summary, below is the core question and key restraints associated with the question. Cheers!

How do I successful kill a java background thread that is stuck in a specific operation?

Scenario Restraints:

  • No control of having operation pause
    and check the threads requested state
  • Specific to Blackberry’s
    implementation of Java ME 1.2 and its
    Thread API so no explicit
    kill() method
  • Most concerned about the best practice and how to
    most safely kill a holding thread.

Follow Up/Edit
Neil Coffey recommended that I simply hold a reference to the connection object and instead call close() on that object. I am currently looking into this…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:15:55+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:15 pm

    How to kill a Thread is a difficult question. There is no guaranteed way to be able to stop or interrupt a Thread. However, if you take your current architecture and upon timeout, just close the stream (not the Connection), that should cause an I/O Exception to occur on the thread that is stuck in I/O. If it doesn’t cause an IOException, then it should at least cause the read or write to return with EOF.

    Note that closing the Connection doesn’t help, as the JavaDoc says:

    Any open streams will cause the connection to be held open until
    they themselves are closed.

    You have to close the stream that was derived from the Connection.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Question: Can I override default functions in Javascript? Background: After figuring out that I
Question Is it possible to stop a Message Driven Bean (programmatically), so that it
Question context: let say that there is some really important row in config/locales/en.yml that
Question I'd like the CSS background texture for my content area to begin immediately
Question: I receive the following error for the code below, does anyone know why?
Question is not correctly framed i know, how do i code the below logic
Question: Upon click, I see that evt.target.attributes stores all of the attributes in an
Question Is it possible to create a second Preference Dialog that can take some
Question Does anyone know of a way to round a float to the nearest
Question: input an int number ex: ABCD, verify that is ABCD = AB*CD or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.