Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7689115
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T20:05:23+00:00 2026-05-31T20:05:23+00:00

Question Should one discard a packet with an unknown IPv6 extension header? Details I

  • 0

Question

Should one discard a packet with an unknown IPv6 extension header?

Details

I could not find an answer to this question by examining the RFC. The book IPv6 Essentials states on page 22:

If a node is required the next header but cannot identify the value in the Next Header field, it is required to discard the packet and send an ICMPv6 Parameter Problem message back to the source of the packet.

I read this as: a IPv6 packet with a custom extension header cannot will be dropped unless all IPv6 stacks along the path know how to deal with the header. Or equivalently, if a single IPv6 device along the path does not know how to handle a custom header, it discards the packet.

This seems at odds with the general idea of extension: I cannot introduce a new extension without upgrading the whole network, even if the custom extension does not influence a generic IPv6 stack.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T20:05:24+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 8:05 pm

    From RFC2460 (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6)):

    If, as a result of processing a header, a node is required to proceed
    to the next header but the Next Header value in the current header is
    unrecognized by the node, it should discard the packet and send an
    ICMP Parameter Problem message to the source of the packet, with an
    ICMP Code value of 1 ("unrecognized Next Header type encountered")
    and the ICMP Pointer field containing the offset of the unrecognized
    value within the original packet.  The same action should be taken if
    a node encounters a Next Header value of zero in any header other
    than an IPv6 header.
    

    As extension headers use the Next Header field I’d interpret this as meaning you’re expected to discard the packet and send an ICMP error back.
    Note that his only applies to the destination host. Routers are supposed to ignore all extension headers:

    With one exception, extension headers are not examined or processed
    by any node along a packet's delivery path, until the packet reaches
    the node (or each of the set of nodes, in the case of multicast)
    identified in the Destination Address field of the IPv6 header.
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This may not be the kind of question one should ask on StackOverflow, but
not sure if this question should be here or in serverfault, but it's java-related
Simple question, when should one not use MySQL? There are two facets to my
This question should be simple to answer for anyone with Node experience -- unfortunately
I have a question about best practices regarding how one should approach storing complex
A beginner question, bear with me: I'm just wondering under what circumstances one should
One of the responses to a question I asked yesterday suggested that I should
A related question to one I asked earlier ... Just checking on something: Should
This is one of those I probably should know this, but I don't questions.
This is a follow-up to the question: Should the folders in a solution match

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.