Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 206393
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:38:31+00:00 2026-05-11T17:38:31+00:00

Question slightly in the abstract… We have a situation where we have a struct

  • 0

Question slightly in the abstract…
We have a situation where we have a struct that can be accessed by 2 or 3 threads concurrently.
We wish to signal to a thread that tries to modify the struct if it is already being modified.

e.g. The code at the moment:

thread0: struct->modify(var SomeNewState)
thread1: struct->modify(var SomeNewState)
thread2: struct->modify(var SomeNewState)  

void struct::modify(var SomeNewState) {
    EnterCriticalSection(&criticalSection);
    change some state...
    LeaveCriticalSection(&criticalSection);
}

What we would like to do is have struct::modify() return immediately to indicate if the criticalSection is in use. That is, we don’t want the other threads to wait on this criticalSection.

The reason we need to do this is that the first thread in ‘wins’ and we don’t want the other threads to wait with what is then stale state. As long as the calls are not concurrent the state is valid (states are queued elsewhere). The changing of state itself is not a long operation, but is has real-world consequences that do take a long time (3-4s) to happen.

EDIT:
Solution is something along these lines.

int struct::modify(var SomeNewState) {
    if(TryEnterCriticalSection(&criticalSection)) {
        change some state...
        LeaveCriticalSection(&criticalSection);
        return 0;
    }
    else {
        return 1;
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:38:31+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:38 pm

    Are you using Windows?

    TryEnterCriticalSection

    [Edit: fixed link]

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a slightly theoretical question that I want to clear up before I
I have a abstract entity class that 3 slightly different entities implements. In my
A slightly archaic question I'm afraid but here goes: I have a program which
I have a question which is slightly similar to this question on stackoverflow std::cin.clear()
OK, this is a slightly weird question. We have a touch-screen application (i.e., no
Let's suggest that I have a bean defined in Spring: <bean id=neatBean class=com... abstract=true>...</bean>
EDIT: I have reworded the title question slightly, and adjusted the text to respond
I realize that this question is slightly server related and could be posted on
I have been told that the automatically generated tests in VS2008 can be made
A slightly odd question for you all - I have solved my issue of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.