Question

Quirky question:

Imagine that I have a base class called BaseFoo. I have an interface with some methods called IFoo. And I have tons of classes beneath BaseFoo.

If i implement the interface in BaseFoo, i dont need to implement in the inherited classes, correct?

Ok, but imagine that i have a generic function that will treat IFoo’s. Do i need to explicitely declare that they implement IFoo?

Like this (pseudo-illustrational-code)

public class BaseFoo:IFoo;

public interface IFoo;

Should i do this?

public class AmbarFoo:BaseFoo,IFoo

or?

public class AmbarFoo:BaseFoo

What is the most correct way? Are the effects the same? If i test if AmbarFoo is a IFoo what will I get?

Thanks

Answer 1

It will behave the same way regardless. You’d only need to restate the interface name if you wanted to reimplement the interface with explicit interface implementation. An instance of AmbarFoo will indeed “say” that it implements IFoo.