Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7702765
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T23:18:10+00:00 2026-05-31T23:18:10+00:00

quite some time ago i noticed that in Visual C++ 10 ADL fails when

  • 0

quite some time ago i noticed that in Visual C++ 10 ADL fails when at least one of the arguments is a lambda.

std::vector<float> vec;
for_each(begin(vec), end(vec), [](float) {}); 

The above fails to compile on VC++10 and 11 (beta) (begin and end are found via ADL). When i convert the lambda function into a regular free function things work just as expected.

I’ve asked on Herb Sutters blog once and also read some posts on msdn connect and the usual answers were: this is a bug, we havent implemented the latest standard of the lambdas yet which – at that time – was quite understandable. Things haven’t been in a baked form yet. On MS connect there have also been disturbing comments that this will not be resolved for the next release i.e. vc 11.

My question is, is this code expected to work under the C++11 standard? I cant quite figure that out. Do i really have to prefix my for_each and other algorithms with std:: when I’m using lambdas?
I somehow suspect that this behavior will not change after vc++11 release.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T23:18:11+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 11:18 pm

    That is perfectly valid code. Any bug-free compiler will be able to compile it. But since MSVC has bug and so is unable to search the function through ADL, then maybe you should not rely on ADL and instead qualify it with std:: helping the compiler to find the function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've got a function I wrote quite some time ago that works fine, but
This question was asked quite some time ago, and while it covers possible solutions
I remember coming across an article on I think CodeProject quite some time ago
I remember some rules from a time ago (pre-32bit Intel processors), when was quite
Recently I spent quite some time writing various Visual Studio Extensions projects. Even though
this syntax was started quite some time ago, and I do not understand its
Some time ago we took over the responsibility of a legacy code base. One
I had a local branch which was branched off master quite some time ago,
I'm refactoring code that was written some time ago when linq and delegates didn't
I have a lot of unmanaged C++ code written quite some time ago. Now,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.