Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 559277
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:13:17+00:00 2026-05-13T12:13:17+00:00

Rails has a has_one :through association that helps set up a one-to-one association with

  • 0

Rails has a has_one :through association that helps set up a one-to-one association with a third model by going through a second model. What is the real use of that besides making a shortcut association, that would otherwise be an extra step away.

Taking this example from the Rails guide:

class Supplier < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_one :account
  has_one :account_history, :through => :account
end

class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :supplier
  has_one :account_history
end

class AccountHistory < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :account
end

might allow us to do something like:

supplier.account_history

which would otherwise be reached as:

supplier.account.history

If it’s only for simpler access then technically there could be a one-to-one association that connects a model with some nth model going through n-1 models for easier access. Is there anything else to it that I am missing besides the shortcut?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:13:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:13 pm
    1. Logic, OK it might sound a bit weak for this but it would be logical to say that “I have a supplier who has an account with me, I want to see the entire account history of this supplier”, so it makes sense for me to be able to access account history from supplier directly.

    2. Efficiency, this for me is the main reason I would use :through, simply because this issues a join statement rather than calling supplier, and then account, and then account_history. noticed the number of database calls?

      • using :through, 1 call to get the supplier, 1 call to get account_history (rails automatically uses :join to retrieve through account)

      • using normal association, 1 call to get supplier, 1 call to get account, and 1 call to get account_history

    That’s what I think =) hope it helps!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Ruby on Rails has a screencast presentation they use to promote their framework that
My Rails 3 app has 2 models and a third that's join table between
How can I generate form fields for a has_many :through association that has additional
Rails has a nice idiom that makes it easy for you to have a
Rails has a method form_for which takes a &proc that contains the content present
I'm aware that Rails has a few different levels for logging, but how can
The Paperclip plugin for Rails has a resize option that keeps the image in
I'm in the process of converting my Rails app to use mongodb through mongoid.
I can't figure out why rails has_one :through associations don't accept assignments. Here is
I have a has_one association between user and setting model. I have also SettingsController

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.