Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6624873
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T21:42:21+00:00 2026-05-25T21:42:21+00:00

Ran across some code that used this, which led me to wonder. if(condition) foo

  • 0

Ran across some code that used this, which led me to wonder.

if(condition) foo = bar();

condition && (foo = bar());

Are these two segments of code equal to a compiler? If not, in what ways would they differ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T21:42:22+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 9:42 pm

    Unless && is overloaded for the combination of types of condition and foo they will have identical behavior – the latter will work this way:

    bool result;
    if( !condition ) {
         result = false;
    } else {
         foo = bar();
         result = foo != 0;
    }
    and result gets ignored
    

    that’s usual short-circuiting – if the first component of && is false the second is not evaluated.

    IMO the second variant is much less readable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I ran across some very interesting code that makes me wonder about what bool
I ran across some code like this today; having a flow control flag that
I recently ran across some 3rd party C# code which does the following: public
I'm looking at some GXT code for GWT and I ran across this use
I recently ran across some code which the person did the first one. Would
I ran across an interesting issue in some of my humanize_bytes() code. This loop
I just ran across some jQuery that looks like this: $('.add-row').live('click.add', function() { //
I'm just starting out with iphone development and ran across some example code that
We just ran across some bad code like this in our c#.net 4 codebase
I ran across some code recently at work (recreated to be similar to what

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.