Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7067531
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T05:12:48+00:00 2026-05-28T05:12:48+00:00

Reading source code of my current project, I see: [self retain] in one class,

  • 0

Reading source code of my current project, I see:

[self retain]

in one class, in its init method.

I don’t understand exactly the reason.
Reading memory management rules from Apple, I don’t see anything about this, and I don’t see any hypothetical [self release].

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T05:12:48+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 5:12 am

    The object is asserting ownership of itself when it is initialised. The only reason I can see that this might be useful is if the object needs to guarantee its own existence until some event has happened. For example, it might run a timer and then release itself when the timer expires.

    If it’s not documented and there is no corresponding release, it’s probably a bug.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I`m reading the code of some open source project. I see that in one
When reading some FreeBSD source code (See: radix.h lines 158-173), I found variable declarations
As the example below, I came across this one when reading the source code
A lot of times when reading source code I see something like this: public
When reading source code of Django, I find some statements: class Field(object): Base class
Reading source code of sample projects, such as Beast and Bort, are recommended as
When reading source code, I always want to know the full path of the
When I reading source code of Beast, I found a lot of code like
I am a beginner in C. While reading git's source code, I found this
I'm reading this C++ open source code and I came to a constructor but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.