Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1029565
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T12:33:48+00:00 2026-05-16T12:33:48+00:00

Reading the Bruce Eckel book Thinking in C#, to relearn C#, since I haven’y

  • 0

Reading the Bruce Eckel book “Thinking in C#”, to relearn C#, since I haven’y used it for many years but am likely to be needing it again soon.

I was surprised by this statement:

“In C++, the keyword that implements
parameterized types is “template.”
.NET currently has no parameterized
types since it is possible for it to
get by—however awkwardly—using the
singly rooted hierarchy. However,
there is no doubt that parameterized
types will be implemented in a future
version of the .NET Framework.”

I think I remember reading somewhere that C# has generics – which are similar to C++ templates?

Am I wrong, or is the Eckel book simply too outdated (if so, is it worth still reading or is there a more up to date book online?)

[Edit]

Eeek, I’m glad I checked in here first. Looks like I’ll have to throw that book away (written in 2002 I believe). Can anyone recommend any downloadable book that has the same depth of Eckels ‘Thinking in …’ series?

There are a lot of C# books out there, but most of them are far too basic, or do not cover enough material. I was happy to find Eckel’s book, since he covers C# in usual thorough style (from an introduction to OOP [which I don’t need], through WinForm and Threading) – Unfortunately, it looks like its too old (Damn you MS for changing C# specs more times than I’ve had hot dinners!)

Can anyone recommend a good downloadable C# book that has a similar width/depth coverage?

[Edit 2]

Just seen this book:

http://www.free-ebooks-download.org/free-ebook/dotnet/CSharp/beginning-visual-csharp-2010.php

I’d like the opinion of this book from any professional C# developers out there …

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T12:33:49+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:33 pm

    It’s probably describing C# 1.0, which didn’t have generics.

    I would recommend finding a newer book that covers LINQ (introduced in C# 3) and dynamic (C# 4).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm reading through a book on C++ standards: Thinking in C++ by Bruce Eckel.
I'm reading Thinking in C++ by Bruce Eckel. In Chapter 15 (Volume 1) under
I'm reading Bruce Eckel's Thinking in Java and there's an exercise I'm just not
While reading from Bruce Eckel's Thinking in C++ about namespaces, I encountered the following
while reading from BRUCE ECKEL'S THINKING IN C++..i came across the following text In
I've been reading Bruce Eckel's Thinking In Java and in the chapter on generics,
I'm learning C++ right now using Bruce Eckel's Thinking in C++ and I'm in
While reading Bruce Eckel i came across the following example: #include <cstdio> #include <cstdlib>
I came across the following paragraph while reading bruce eckel..where he was trying to
Reading across difference lineage of CPU created by intel , many questions aroused in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.