Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9094117
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T23:16:29+00:00 2026-06-16T23:16:29+00:00

Reading the documentation I can see that + operator can be used to compose/combine

  • 0

Reading the documentation I can see that + operator can be used to compose/combine delegates of the same type.

In the same way I can see that I can remove a from the composed delegate using the - operator.

I also noticed that the Action type has static Combine and Remove methods that can be used to concatenate the invocation lists of two delegates, and to remove the last occurrence of the invocation list of a delegate from the invocation list of another delegate respectively.

        Action a = () => Debug.WriteLine("Invoke a");
        Action b = () => Debug.WriteLine("Invoke b");
        a += b;
        a.Invoke(); 

        //Invoke a
        //Invoke b

        Action c = () => Debug.WriteLine("Invoke c");
        Action d = () => Debug.WriteLine("Invoke d");
        Action e = Action.Combine(c, d);
        e.Invoke();

        //Invoke c
        //Invoke d

        a -= b;
        a.Invoke();

        //Invoke a

        e = Action.Remove(e, d);
        e.Invoke(); 

        //Invoke c

They appear to produce the same results in terms of how they combine/remove from the invocation list.

I have seen both ways used in various examples on SO and in other code. Is there a reason that I should be using one way or the other? Are there any pit falls? For example – I can see a warning in the line a -= b; stating that Delegate subtraction has unpredictable results – so should I avoid this by using Remove?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T23:16:30+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 11:16 pm

    The delegate operators (+ and -) are shorthand for the static methods.
    There is no difference at all.

    a += b compiles to a = (Action)Delegate.Combine(a, b)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From reading the NERDTree documentation on github, I've learned that I can do such
I'm reading the documentation and see that if you don't use an interface then
After a bit of searching and reading the documentation, it's clear that you can
I'm new to Java, and while reading documentation so far I can't find any
reading the documentation for java org.w3c.dom.ls it seems as a Element only can be
Reading the documentation it seems this might not be possible, but it seems that
I'm reading this documentation article about Custom Annotations in Doctrine . I understand that
Reading through documentation, I found following: 1.9.1 1.8.4 1.8.2 A version of 1.8.2 select
When reading some documentation about assertions, I found: java -ea -dsa Enables assertions in
I'm reading the documentation for asynchronous fetch requests in GAE. Python isn't my first

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.