Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 597669
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:18:20+00:00 2026-05-13T16:18:20+00:00

Recently I heard that memory in the stack is not shared with other thread

  • 0

Recently I heard that memory in the stack is not shared with other thread and memory in the heap is shared with other threads.

I normally do:

HWND otherThreadHwnd;
DWORD commandId;
// initialize commandId and otherThreadHwnd

struct MyData {
  int data1_;
  long data2_;
  void* chunk_;
};

int abc() {
  MyData myData;
  // initialize myData
  SendMessage(otherThreadHwnd,commandId,&myData);
  // read myData
}

Is it alright to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:18:20+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:18 pm

    I think 2 different issues are being confused by whoever you “heard that memory in the stack is not shared with other thread”:

    1. object lifetime – the data on the stack is only valid as long the thread doesn’t leave the scope of the variable’s name. In the example you giove, you’re handling this by making the call to the other thread synchronously.

    2. memory address visibility – the addresses pspace for a process is shared among the various threads in that process. So variables addressable by one thread are addressable by other threads in that process. If you are passing the address to a thread in a different process, the situation is quite different and you’d need to use some other mechanism (which might be to ensure that the memory block is mapped into both processes – but that I don’t think that can normally be done with stack memory).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.