Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 531557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:18:48+00:00 2026-05-13T09:18:48+00:00

Recently I was reading about partitioning code with .NET assemblies and stumbled upon a

  • 0

Recently I was reading about partitioning code with .NET assemblies and stumbled upon a nice suggestion from this post: “reduce the number of your .NET assemblies to the strict minimum”.

I couldn’t agree more! And one of the reasons I personally see most often, is that people just want to isolate some piece of code, so they make the types/methods internal and put them into a separate project.

There are many other reasons (valid and not) for splitting code into several assemblies, but if you want to isolate components/APIs while still having them located in one library, how can you do that?

namespace MyAssembly.SomeApiInternals
{
     //Methods from this class should not 
     //be used outside MyAssembly.SomeApiInternals
     internal class Foo
     {              
          internal void Boo() { }
     }
}

namespace MyAssembly.AnotherPart
{
     public class Program
     {              
          public void Test() 
          {
               var foo = MyAssembly.SomeApiInternals.Foo();
               foo.Boo(); //Ok, not a compiler error but some red flag at least 
          }
     }
}             

How can one restrict a type/method from being used by other types/methods in the same assembly but outside this very namespace?

(I’m going to give a few answers myself and see how people would vote.)

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:18:48+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:18 am

    You could put the code in different assemblies, then merge the assemblies with ILMerge in a post-build step…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 311k
  • Answers 311k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is a difference between strings and integers -- there… May 13, 2026 at 10:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should use immutable data transfer objects. As long as… May 13, 2026 at 10:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer They're used in different places. GROUP BY modifies the entire… May 13, 2026 at 10:25 pm

Related Questions

Recently I was reading about Codd's 12 Rules , and I understood all except
Recently I was reading about Article on Interviewing an Software Engineering Position by Joel
I've been going through Head First Design Patterns (just came in recently) and I
I recently was reading about Oracle Index Organized Tables (IOTs) but am not sure
I was recently reading about artificial life and came across the statement, Conway’s Game

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.