Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 62839
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:32:19+00:00 2026-05-10T18:32:19+00:00

Recently I wrote a function to generate certain sequences with nontrivial constraints. The problem

  • 0

Recently I wrote a function to generate certain sequences with nontrivial constraints. The problem came with a natural recursive solution. Now it happens that, even for relatively small input, the sequences are several thousands, thus I would prefer to use my algorithm as a generator instead of using it to fill a list with all the sequences.

Here is an example. Suppose we want to compute all the permutations of a string with a recursive function. The following naive algorithm takes an extra argument ‘storage’ and appends a permutation to it whenever it finds one:

def getPermutations(string, storage, prefix=''):    if len(string) == 1:       storage.append(prefix + string)   # <-----    else:       for i in range(len(string)):          getPermutations(string[:i]+string[i+1:], storage, prefix+string[i])  storage = [] getPermutations('abcd', storage) for permutation in storage: print permutation 

(Please don’t care about inefficiency, this is only an example.)

Now I want to turn my function into a generator, i.e. to yield a permutation instead of appending it to the storage list:

def getPermutations(string, prefix=''):    if len(string) == 1:       yield prefix + string             # <-----    else:       for i in range(len(string)):          getPermutations(string[:i]+string[i+1:], prefix+string[i])  for permutation in getPermutations('abcd'):    print permutation 

This code does not work (the function behaves like an empty generator).

Am I missing something? Is there a way to turn the above recursive algorithm into a generator without replacing it with an iterative one?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:32:20+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:32 pm
    def getPermutations(string, prefix=''):     if len(string) == 1:         yield prefix + string     else:         for i in xrange(len(string)):             for perm in getPermutations(string[:i] + string[i+1:], prefix+string[i]):                 yield perm 

    Or without an accumulator:

    def getPermutations(string):     if len(string) == 1:         yield string     else:         for i in xrange(len(string)):             for perm in getPermutations(string[:i] + string[i+1:]):                 yield string[i] + perm 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I recently wrote a small tool to generate a class for each tier I
Recently, Lee Baldwin showed how to write a generic, variable argument memoize function .
I recently wrote a parser in Python using Ply (it's a python reimplementation of
I recently wrote a DLL in C# (.Net 2.0) which contains a class that
I recently wrote a class for an assignment in which I had to store
I recently wrote some javascript code that filled a drop down list based on
I recently wrote a piece of code which did SomeClass someObject; mysqlpp::StoreQueryResult result =
I recently wrote mailing list software in Ruby On Rails. I would like to
I have a Python script I recently wrote that I call using the command

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.