Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8991949
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T22:50:39+00:00 2026-06-15T22:50:39+00:00

Recently I wrote something like this: public void doSomething(boolean b1, boolean b2){ while(true){ if(b1){

  • 0

Recently I wrote something like this:

public void doSomething(boolean b1, boolean b2){
   while(true){
      if(b1){
         doThis();
      }
      if(b2){
         doThat();
      }
   }
}

But I really don’t like this solution, because in every iteration you will have to check the 2 booleans. So as possible solution I could imagine to write 4 while loops with the ifs before each loop, but for obvious reasons this sucks in maintainability. Do you have any suggestions to make this piece of code nice and effective?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T22:50:40+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 10:50 pm

    I agree that this is premature optimization, but here’s another construct you might be able to use if your language has guarantees on short-circuit evaluation. Since java does not allow you to cast void return types to boolean, you would need to modify doThis() and doThat() to return boolean.

    public void doSomething(boolean b1, boolean b2){
        while(true){
            b1 && doThis(),
            b2 && doThat();
        }
    }
    

    The (x && foo()) will only execute the function if the value of x is true, otherwise short-circuit evaluation will kick in.

    You would have to be extremely careful that your compiler does not just optimize away this entire expression since no values are actually assigned.

    A real, possible optimization that will avoid both comparisons in all cases is to use a switch statement in the inner loop.

    public void doSomething(boolean b1, boolean b2){
        int state = (b1 ? 1 : 0) + (b2 ? 2 : 0);
        while(true){
            switch (state){
                case 1: doThis(); break;
                case 3: doThis();
                case 2: doThat();
                default:
            }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was recently working with a DateTime object, and wrote something like this: DateTime
I saw this recently, thought it was interesting. But I don't really understand what
I recently wrote a piece of code that looked a bit like this: IEnumerable<DTO.Employee>
I recently found one of my fellow programmers wrote something like: int foo() {
I recently implemented a progress bar class in C++. I wrote something like cout
Until recently, I posted Python code (whitespace matters) to blogspot.com using something like this:
I'd like to know whether something like this has been done before: I've recently
I recently found out about C# extension methods and wrote this one: /// <summary>
Working on existing code, I recently found smt like this: if(Config.ExceptionBehavior.DEBUG_EXCEPTIONS) { foo.Foo(); }
I've discovered this idiom recently, and I am wondering if there is something I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.