Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7558177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T12:18:20+00:00 2026-05-30T12:18:20+00:00

Recently I’ve been using ModelName.where(nil) in certain situations when I might use ModelName.all .

  • 0

Recently I’ve been using ModelName.where(nil) in certain situations when I might use ModelName.all.

The difference between the two is that the former returns an ActiveRecord Relation, whereas the latter returns an array. I can chain queries off the former, but not the latter. I’m not pleased that I lose the self-documenting nature of ModelName.all though.

Is there some method like ModelName.all that returns an AR Relation and maintains self-documentation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T12:18:21+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 12:18 pm

    ModelName.scoped will give you an AR relation with the default scope, ModelName.unscoped will give the the AR relation without the default scope.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Recently I'm doing some work on RTMP streaming, that is using Flowplayer to integrate
Recently I had a problem using (pipe |-) when I wanted to communicate between
Recently I have been told that static class/methods are evil. Take for example my
Recently had an interviewer ask to define the difference between objects and primitives. Seemed
Recently I have been investigating the possibilities of caching in ASP.NET. I rolled my
Recently, I've been dealing with an error with accessing MAPI via the .NET framework
Recently our site has been deluged with the resurgence of the Asprox botnet SQL
Recently I've noticed that on occasion I do not get a mayorship notification when
Recently I have been dealing with windows LogonUser API. The LogonUser api returns different
recently I started using storyboard and I've the following situation: I want to set

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.