Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3455760
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:39:13+00:00 2026-05-18T09:39:13+00:00

Recently, I’ve been using one of the lesser-used STL features- custom allocators, and I

  • 0

Recently, I’ve been using one of the lesser-used STL features- custom allocators, and I need some serious help in reducing my semantic overhead. Take for example, the definition of an unordered map, which maps filenames to an unordered map of a pair of ints and a shared_ptr to a Token, but using a custom allocator.

typedef std::pair<int, int> token_key_type;
typedef std::unordered_map<
    token_key_type, 
    std::shared_ptr<Token>,
    std::hash<token_key_type>,
    std::equal_to<token_key_type>,
    Allocator<
        std::pair<
            const token_key_type, 
            std::shared_ptr<
                Token
            >
        >
    >
> filename_map_value_type;
std::unordered_map<
    string, 
    filename_map_value_type,
    std::hash<string>,
    std::equal_to<string>,
    Allocator<
        std::pair<
            const string, 
            filename_map_value_type
        >
    >
> tokens;

That’s 404 characters of definitions. And then to construct it, I have to pass in the default for every template argument, except the Allocator, which can’t be default constructed, AND the bucket count, for which no definition exists, resulting in another 168 characters just to construct the damn thing. Plus, of course, the same again every time I want to insert, because the value type of the first map has to be constructed like that too.

Is there any way that all of this can be avoided without having to write my own unordered_map? It’s seriously starting to slow down my productivity.

Edit: Sorry! I meant, in general, for STL containers, not just unordered_map specifically, it’s just the worst case. I’ve also got this problem with regular map, unordered_set, etc, and can’t go writing a function to do all of this for all of the possible STL containers I might need invidually.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:39:14+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:39 am

    icecrime’s solution can also be done with only slightly more ugliness on older compilers via the code below. You also may be able to add factory functions to simplify construction.

    template<typename K, typename V> struct unordered_map_type
    {
        typedef std::unordered_map<
            K, 
            V,
            std::hash<K>,
            std::equal_to<K>,
            Allocator<
                std::pair<const K, V>
            >
        > type;
    };
    
    typedef std::pair<int, int> token_key_type;
    typedef unordered_map_type<token_key_type, std::shared_ptr<Token> >::type filename_map_value_type;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Recently I've used some features that require modern OpenGL context (specifically ARB_debug_output requires to
Recently I am making a server-client program using multithread concept. For some reason, I
Recently I've created one android application using eclipse and ran it using android virtual
Recently one of our app servers went down, when it was rebooted the Python
Recently launched a Magento store which features an image slider on the homepage. Works
Recently, I was asked to compile some of my Android projects, based on the
recently I created a java class Custom Layout Manager , which I want to
Recently, I had the need for a function that I could use to guarantee
Recently I have done an assignment, on overloading basic functionalists(+,-,conjugate...) of complex class using
Recently I've been doing a lot of these enum Thing { /* etc etc

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.