Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9199633
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T22:34:42+00:00 2026-06-17T22:34:42+00:00

Recently security vulnerabilities were discovered in the Java Plug-In 1 . As a protection

  • 0

Recently security vulnerabilities were discovered in the Java Plug-In1. As a protection for the end user, Java in most browsers was disabled promptly. What do the ‘Java disabled’ warnings look like?

Does the blocking of applets also affect Java Web Start apps. (they are launched from a link in a web page) aimed at desktop use?

  1. Security vulnerability in the Oracle Java Plug-In. For more details see:
    • The JRE 1.7 Vulnerability Q&A at SO.
    • Oracle Security Alert for CVE-2013-0422
    • The Java™ SE Development Kit 7, Update 11 (JDK 7u11) release notes – the version in which the vulnerability was fixed.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T22:34:43+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 10:34 pm

    What do the ‘Java disabled’ warnings look like?

    This is how Oracle’s test Java page appears now. It is an embedded applet.

    FireFox

    FireFox - Security Vulnerabilities

    Chrome

    Message in yellow bar at top of browser:

    Java(TM) was blocked because it is out of date. Update plug-in... Run this time – learn more x

    Shown in place of applet, and on right click produces menu..

    Chrome - Java is out of date

    Note re version 1.7.0_11

    Java version 1.7.0_11 that fixes the bug, mentioned in the last link in the question, does not enable the browsers again. Those warnings above were seen despite that this info. can be seen after enabling the plug-in for either browser..

    Latest Java Installed - Version: Java SE 7 Update 11

    It might indicate that the Oracle fix for the bug is to permanently load applets in this ‘prompted for every one’ way. That might not be a bad thing.

    Does the blocking of applets also affect JWS apps?

    No it does not. Just applets (and applets embedded using JWS).

    Here is how you might see a JWS app. deployed using deployJava.js which (checks for the JRE and) shows an icon like this (without prompt – if installed).

    JWS launch icon

    If launching (for example) the JavaFX 1.2 demo. – Powerful UI Capabilities With Node-Based Controls I see the icon for launching the JWS app. At the same (security vulnerability) time I still see that warning on the applet mentioned above.


    Note that the Java FX demo. does itself have security risks/prompts for ‘application components that might indicate a security concern’ from ‘mixing signed & unsigned code’.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I recently learned about Java's security model. Most people think Java is secure because
Microsoft recently (12-29-2011) released an update to address several serious security vulnerabilities in the
I recently redesigned the security on a file server of ours, marking most of
Let's say you recently discovered some major vulnerabilities in a couple of websites that
I've been working on a spring security recently and I need to know how
Recently, I was writing a class in which I discovered that I could reduce
A rather high-profile security vulnerability in Rails recently illuminated the potential dangers of parsing
Recently the security team on my project released a secure code guidelines document, designed
I recently learned that overlong encodings cause a security risk when not properly validated.
Recently, we had a security audit on our code, and one of the problem

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.