Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 74099
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:18:18+00:00 2026-05-10T20:18:18+00:00

Recently, when porting some STL code to VS2008 I wanted to disable warnings generated

  • 0

Recently, when porting some STL code to VS2008 I wanted to disable warnings generated by std::copy by defining the new _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS flag. You can do this in two ways:

  • Using the /D compiler switch, which can be specified in the project properties. You need to ensure it is defined for both Release and Debug builds, which I often forget to do.
  • By defining it macro style before you include the relevant STL headers, or, for total coverage, in stdafx.h:

    #define _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS

Both of these methods work fine but I wondered if there was any argument for favouring one over the other?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:18:19+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    The /D option is generally used when you want to define it differently on different builds (so it can be changed in the makefile)

    If you will ‘always’ want it set the same way, use #define.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 67k
  • Answers 67k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Block eval can be nested: sub function { eval {… May 11, 2026 at 11:51 am
  • added an answer From the Foundation Functions Reference: BOOL NSPointInRect ( NSPoint aPoint,… May 11, 2026 at 11:51 am
  • added an answer I presume you found the question on Jon Skeet's Brainteasers… May 11, 2026 at 11:51 am

Related Questions

Recently, when porting some STL code to VS2008 I wanted to disable warnings generated
I recently resolved an issue my VB6 application had when saving large binary objects
I recently downloaded PLT Scheme and DrScheme. When I open DrScheme, I am told
I recently upgraded to Eclipse Ganymede from Europa and now I'm finding that when
I've just recently upgraded to SQL Server 2008 from 2005 and when I attempt
I have recently installed .net 3.5 SP1. When I deployed a compiled web site
I have had a bug recently that only manifested itself when the library was
I recently upgraded my oracle client to 10g (10.2.0.1.0). Now when I try to
Recently I worked on FindBugs warnings about exposing internal state, i.e. when a reference
I had never tried Continuum as a build server until recently when a project

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.