Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 469091
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T23:44:51+00:00 2026-05-12T23:44:51+00:00

Record syntax seems extremely convenient compared to having to write your own accessor functions.

  • 0

Record syntax seems extremely convenient compared to having to write your own accessor functions. I’ve never seen anyone give any guidelines as to when it’s best to use record syntax over normal data declaration syntax, so I’ll just ask here.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T23:44:52+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:44 pm

    You should use record syntax in two situations:

    1. The type has many fields
    2. The type declaration gives no clue about its intended layout

    For instance a Point type can be simply declared as:

    data Point = Point Int Int deriving (Show)
    

    It is obvious that the first Int denotes the x coordinate and the second stands for y. But the case with the following type declaration is different (taken from Learn You a Haskell for Great Good):

    data Person = Person String String Int Float String String deriving (Show) 
    

    The intended type layout is: first name, last name, age, height, phone number, and favorite ice-cream flavor. But this is not evident in the above declaration. Record syntax comes handy here:

    data Person = Person { firstName :: String  
                         , lastName :: String  
                         , age :: Int  
                         , height :: Float  
                         , phoneNumber :: String  
                         , flavor :: String  
                         } deriving (Show)   
    

    The record syntax made the code more readable, and saved a great deal of typing by automatically defining all the accessor functions for us!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 500k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not pretty but it works: rm -R $(ls… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. Override the base1 and base2 methods in Derived to… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can't. Unfortunately, UIEvent doesn't expose any public way… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Is it possible to use the syntax using(_mocks.Record()) { //... } using(_mocks.Playback()) { //...
In active record to write a model you write: [ActiveRecord(TableName)] public class Model {
I'm trying to write a function in PL/PgSQL that have to work with a
I may be the minority here, but it seems through my entire academic/professional career
I don't see what's wrong here, but I may just misunderstand the syntax. I'm
I have the url that i retrieve for an item and for each record
struct Record { char Surname[20]; char Initial; unsigned short int Gender; //0 = male
So there is record.new_record? To check if something is new I need to check
I need to set value in mapped record to some arbitrary sql expression, so
I have one procedure which updates record values, and i want to fire it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.