Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Related to my previous question, but with C#, I need the precise system time including milliseconds.
C# time function has accuracy up to 10 to 15 milliseconds, but not exactly 1 millisecond.
The same is the case with Queue performance counter. Is there any other way to get accuracy up to exact millisecond?
Windows does not want to waste electricity by updating the system clock 1000 times per second, so the default is to only update it 60-100 times per second. If you set the multimedia timer to 1ms, you can get 1ms resolution from the clock, but that’s not recommended.
To elaborate more on the electricity savings, what happens when the CPU is idle for a period of time is that it can go into a very-low-power state. Whenever it gets interrupted (e.g. to increment the clock ticks) it has to leave its very-low-power state and use lots of electricity to power the whole CPU to service that interrupt. In other words, the additional power isn’t in incrementing the clock ticks, it’s in keeping the CPU awake to do it.
Since my laptop uses 10W at idle when the clock frequency is 60Hz and 11W when it’s 1000Hz, and I get 300 minutes of battery life, that slower clock is giving me almost 30 extra minutes of battery life!