Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 542245
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:25:35+00:00 2026-05-13T10:25:35+00:00

Ruby 1.9 gives the ability to define variables that are just local to a

  • 0

Ruby 1.9 gives the ability to define variables that are just local to a block and do not close over variables of the same name in an outer scope:

x = 10
proc { |;x|
    x = 20
}.call
x #=> 10

I would like to have this behaviour as default for some blocks I define – without having to use the |;x, y, z| syntax (note the semicolon).

I do not think Ruby allows this natively but is it possible to hack this functionality?

I have one solution currently but it’s quite ugly as it requires checking to see which locals have changed at the end of a block and then reverting them to their values prior to the block. I do not mind if your solution requires specifying which variables are block-local at the start of the block i.e scope(:x) { x = 20 }

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:25:35+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:25 am

    The solution I am choosing is based on bobbywilson0’s idea. Here is how it works:

    x = 99
    y = 98
    
    scope { |x, y|
        x = 20
        y = 30
    }
    
    x #=> 99
    y #=> 98 
    

    This is useful as the variables used in the scope are created at the start of the scope and do not close over any variables defined outside it, they are also GC’d at the end of the scope.

    Here is the implementation:

    def scope(&block)
        num_required = block.arity >= 0 ? block.arity : ~block.arity
        yield *([nil] * num_required)
    end
    

    This solution also takes default values into account making it functionally equivalent to a let* in lisp.

    scope { |x = 20, z = (x * 3)| 
        x #=> 20
        z #=> 60
    }
    

    I blogged on it here: http://banisterfiend.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/controlling-object-scope-in-ruby-1-9/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any gem/plugin for ruby on rails which gives the ability to define
Is there a tool that parses a Ruby script (MRI/YARV) and gives statistics of
In ruby-doc , it says that <Fixnum> ** <Numeric> may be fractional, and gives
How can I discover if two given files have the same permissions in Ruby?
I am considering developing an application using Ruby on Rails that is a planner
On my ubuntu box, irb (ruby) gives a NameError when I try to use
Using Ruby (1.8.7) and Rails (2.3.8) doing myObject.attributes gives you a hash of attribute
I'm stuck with this problem. cat ~/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p249/gems/nokogiri-1.4.1/ext/nokogiri/mkmf.log Gives this errors (clipped) conftest.c:3: error: 'xmlParseDoc'
I am running Rails 3.0.1 with Ruby 1.9.2p290.In rails c Time.zone gives => (GMT+00:00)
Is there any library that can replace RMagick ? It´s over 2 yeas ago

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.