Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7896459
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T07:54:00+00:00 2026-06-03T07:54:00+00:00

$ ruby -v $ ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux] I have: rvm list

  • 0
$ ruby -v
$ ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux]

I have:

rvm list rubies

rvm rubies

   ree-1.8.7-2011.03 [ x86_64 ]
 * ruby-1.9.3-p125 [ x86_64 ]

# => - current
# =* - current && default
#  * - default

but I get:

$ ruby soduko.rb 
nil
nil

I can’t switch to 1.9.3:

rvm use 1.9.3
Gemset '' does not exist, 'rvm gemset create ' first, or append '--create'.

$ rvm gemset create
# Noting(?)

$ rvm gemset create md
Gemset '' does not exist, 'rvm gemset create ' first, or append '--create'.

$ ruby -v
$ ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux]
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T07:54:02+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 7:54 am

    Probably the new gemset is required to be made and associated together with ruby version. Try this command:

    rvm use 1.9.3@newgemset --create --default
    

    You should also try rvm use ruby-1.9.3-p125 --default, sometimes mentioning patch number works (but as far as I’ve seen this dependency is only seen when working on different patches of same version, still worth a shot)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

> luke@Macbook-Pro~/Documents/workspace/RoR/rails_projects/sample4_app$ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [i686-darwin10.8.0] luke@Macbook-Pro~/Documents/workspace/RoR/rails_projects/sample4_app$ rails -v Rails
ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i586-linux] From script/console: >> pairs = Array.new(2).map!{Array.new(2).map!{Array.new(2, Array.new)}} =>
I'm having issues with the libv8 gem with ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [x86_64-darwin10.8.0].
Ruby Settings From terminal % ruby -v ruby 1.9.2p180 (2011-02-18 revision 30909) [i686-linux] =>
I've installed MacRuby (via rvm): $ ruby -v MacRuby 0.10 (ruby 1.9.2) [universal-darwin10.0, x86_64]
My Ruby version: ruby 1.8.7 (2011-02-18 patchlevel 334) [i386-mingw32] My Rails version: Rails 2.3.11
Somehow my rails installation hides itself successfully... I have: ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553)
I have Ubuntu 11.10 and am using rvm with ruby 1.9.2. I followed this
If I do ruby -v I get: ruby 1.9.3p0 (2011-10-30 revision 33570) [x86_64-darwin11.3.0] But
Ruby doesn't seem to have a facility for defining a protected/private block like so:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.