Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 277009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T01:00:26+00:00 2026-05-12T01:00:26+00:00

Ruby’s unit testing framework executes unit tests even though nobody creates unit test object.

  • 0

Ruby’s unit testing framework executes unit tests even though nobody creates unit test object. For example,

in MyUnitTest.rb

require 'test/unit'

class MyUnitTest < Test::Unit::TestCase
    def test_true
        assert true
    end
end

and when i invoke that script as

ruby MyUnitTest.rb

test_true method gets executed automatically. How is this done?

I am trying to come up with a framework that can do similarly. I dont want “if __ FILE __ == $0” at the end of every module that uses my framework.

thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T01:00:26+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:00 am

    Test::Unit uses at_exit for this, which runs code immediately before your application quits:

    at_exit do
      puts "printed before quit"
    end
    
    .. other stuff
    

    I don’t think there is any way to run code specifically after a class or module definition is closed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 208k
  • Answers 208k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Consider the following ITask: using Microsoft.Build.Framework; using Microsoft.Build.Utilities; namespace My.MSBuild.Tasks… May 12, 2026 at 9:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Assuming you have one section and a sorted NSArray or… May 12, 2026 at 9:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You presumably want the param delimiters to have the string… May 12, 2026 at 9:29 pm

Related Questions

Ruby has two different exceptions mechanisms: Throw/Catch and Raise/Rescue. Why do we have two?
Ruby setters—whether created by (c)attr_accessor or manually—seem to be the only methods that need
Ruby's standard popen3 module does not work on Windows. Is there a maintained replacement
Ruby has a wealth of conditional constructs, including if / unless , while /
Ruby on Rails does not do multithreaded request-responses very well, or at least, ActiveRecord

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.