Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5988491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T22:57:57+00:00 2026-05-22T22:57:57+00:00

Running the following code on Windows 7 x64 #include <stdio.h> #include <errno.h> int main()

  • 0

Running the following code on Windows 7 x64

#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>

int main() {
    int i;
    FILE *tmp;
    for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
        errno = 0;
        if(!(tmp = tmpfile())) printf("Fail %d, err %d\n", i, errno);
        fclose(tmp);
    }
    return 0;
}

Gives errno 13 (Permission denied), on the 637th and 1004th call, it works fine on XP (haven’t tried 7 x86). Am I missing something or is this a bug?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T22:57:57+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 10:57 pm

    A bit of a refresher from the manpage of on tmpfile(), which returns a FILE*:

    The file will be automatically deleted when it is closed or the program terminates.

    My verdict for this issue: Deleting a file on Windows is weird.

    When you delete a file on Windows, for as long as something holds a handle, you can’t call CreateFile on something with the same absolute path, otherwise it will fail with the NT error code STATUS_DELETE_PENDING, which gets mapped to the Win32 code ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED. This is probably where EPERM in errno is coming from. You can confirm this with a tool like Sysinternals Process Monitor.

    My guess is that CRT somehow wound up creating a file that has the same name as something it’s used before. I’ve sometimes witnessed that deleting files on Windows can appear asynchronous because some other process (sometimes even an antivirus product, in reaction to the fact that you’ve just closed a delete-on-close handle…) will leave a handle open to the file, so for some timing window you will see a visible file that you can’t get a handle to without hitting delete pending/access denied. Or, it could be that tmpfile has simply chosen a filename that some other process is working on.

    To avoid this sort of thing you might want to consider another mechanism for temp files… For example a function like Win32 GetTempFileName allows you to create your own prefix which might make a collision less likely. That function appears to resolve race conditions by retrying if a create fails with “already exists”, so be careful about deleting the temp filenames that thing generates – deleting the file cancels your rights to use it concurrently with other processes/threads.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to build a C++ extension for python using swig. I've followed the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.