Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7628841
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T05:40:38+00:00 2026-05-31T05:40:38+00:00

rvm had a substantial impact on ruby programming and for a long time brought

  • 0

rvm had a substantial impact on ruby programming and for a long time brought lasting benefits to us, but honestly I need to stay agile and informed about other possibilities at this point. Lately I only get one version of Ruby to manage so I’m not sure if the benefit is outweighing the cost of configuration.

One alternative, rbenv, has worked well for me. rbenv is an alternative because it let’s us set the global ruby version on a per-user basis, and like rvm offers support for per-project Ruby versions. Also you can override the Ruby version with an environment variable. I do not know what it’s like yet to use ry. If anyone has used ry or the other alternatives, please share any knowledge or experience on this question I feel is important. I am always interested in things I have not heard of and knowing more about some of these alternatives to Ruby Version Manager (rvm). Also I feel grateful for Stackoverflow.com and this area of the internet’s wealth of knowledge. Thank you.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T05:40:39+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 5:40 am

    Here is the list of available alternatives https://github.com/wayneeseguin/rvm/blob/master/docs/alt.md

    There is one big difference between RVM and the rest of tools – RVM has big experience with a lot of corner cases, it covers many possible configurations, it is used on many different *nix distributions.

    So all the small tools cover the minimalistic way of doing things, like installation:

    ./configure --prefix=$HOME/rubies/1.9.3
    make
    make install
    

    Q: what prevents you from doing it ?
    A: Experience, do you know it will exactly build and run on any system you try ? RVM does just that it tries to provide you one way to install on every system.

    The mentioned ruby 1.9.3 will most likely compile just fine, but for example you can use patches, RVM does provide already many patches, few of them are installed automatically to solve compilation/building issues, like ruby 1.8.7 or 1.8.6.

    But there are other things, you want to use JRuby on production (it happens to be faster) so you need to test it … in 1.9 mode ? that’s easy just say to RVM to use 1.9 mode:

    rvm install jruby-1.6.7 --1.9
    

    now it will be by default using 1.9 mode and trust me getting there is not that easy – at least for now.

    There is a lot of things which RVM does to you and for you, with latest development version you can use other project files not only .rvmrc -> https://gist.github.com/1912050#gistcomment-86549 you could play for example using .ruby-version project file which is already supported by rbfu and always get back to RVM if you feel like you need more.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using ubunutu natty narwhal.I had installed ruby,rails,rvm etc.. sometime back and everything
My development environment: Ubuntu 9 Ruby 1.9.1/1.8.7 (rvm) Rails 2.3.5 Mysql 5.0 Apache Passenger
I am pretty sure watir-webdriver had css selector support, but looks like it is
In order to build ruby 1.9 on mac I had to install gcc 4.6.
I have installed rvm (mutiuser option) and ruby using rvm install on my test
I've removed recently rvm and reinstalled it, that worked fine. But now, when I'm
My env: rvm ruby 1.9.2 , and I build ImageMagick 6.7.4-6 from source. When
I had already installed rails 1.8.7, forgot about it, then installed 1.9.3 through RVM.
what I need to write to my environment to repair my rvm? (and when
I thought I had the assets pipeline figured out, but not any more. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.