Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6065063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:20:56+00:00 2026-05-23T09:20:56+00:00

Say I have 100,000 Tweets. How can I use active record to very efficiently

  • 0

Say I have 100,000 Tweets. How can I use active record to very efficiently select just one Tweet?

Tweet.all => [100K Records]

I want => Tweet.find_by_id[random] (something like this)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:20:57+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:20 am

    I would avoid selecting all and just build random into your query, something like this:

    Tweet.find(:first, :order => "RAND()")

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If I have a large binary file (say it has 100,000,000 floats), is there
Say you have a MySQL 5.0 MyISAM table with 100 million rows, with one
Say I have a byte array with 100,000 bytes in it. I want to
So, lets say I have 100,000 float arrays with 100 elements each. I need
In Ruby 1.8.6, I have an array of, say, 100,000 user ids, each of
If I have say for example 100,000 rows to insert/update/delete, and this number will
Let's say I have this, that produces 50,000 rows: SELECT photoID FROM photoSearch WHERE
Does anyone have experience with working with large local XML files? Let's say 100.000
I have indexed very large documents, In some cases these documents has 100.000 characters.
Lets say I have 100 servers each running a daemon - lets call it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.