Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 500045
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:02:50+00:00 2026-05-13T06:02:50+00:00

Say I have a method Foo() and I want to measure the time in

  • 0

Say I have a method Foo() and I want to measure the time in milliseconds it took to execute which type of Windows Performance Counter should I be using?

var stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
Foo();
stopwatch.Stop();
counter.RawValue = stopwatch.TotalMilliseonds;

Currently I’m using NumberOfItems64 but that persists the last value of the counter unless the new operation is performed. Is it desirable? Or should the counter go to zero as soon as the operation is done? Which counter type would you choose in this situation and why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:02:50+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:02 am

    This sounds like a good candidate for AverageTimer32. See this SO answer for more details.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have the following line in a method: String encodedString = URLEncoder.encode(foo, utf-8);
So in java, say you have a non-static method 'bar()' in an class 'Foo'.
Say I have a method that I wish to call which has an argument
Let's say I have a method in java, which looks up a user in
Let's say I have a method called foo. What's the difference between: [self foo];
Let's say I have a method public void Foo(string bar) that the caller should
I'm using MooseX::Declare and methods, which uses MooseX::Method::Signatures. Let's say I have a class
Let's say I have a model foo, and my model has a publish! method
Say I have a factory method that churns out instances of type T, and
Say I have the following function: bool foo (int a); // This method declaration

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.