Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 115745
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:04:06+00:00 2026-05-11T03:04:06+00:00

Say I have a .NET class like so: public class Person { public string

  • 0

Say I have a .NET class like so:

public class Person {     public string Name { get; set; }     public int Id { get; set; } } 

Visual Studio has a nifty refactoring tool called Extract Interface that will extract an IPerson interface, and have Person implement it. Is there a way to do that programmatically from outside of Visual Studio? I’d even take a shell script if it can’t be done programmatically.

[EDIT] In actuality, I would have up to 50 classes, each with dependencies on each other.

Reflection would work, but it would introduce another wrinkle into the whole thing. The classes are already generated by xsd.exe. So, if I understand it correctly, the steps I would need to take would be:

  1. Generate classes from xsd.exe.
  2. Compile the classes on the fly so that I can use reflection.
  3. Reflect over them, emit the interfaces, and edit the original classes to implement said interfaces.

Generally I’d be in favor of just ditching the interfaces and using the classes directly, but for various reasons I cannot.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:04:07+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:04 am

    In a word: reflection.

    It’s quite feasible to write a bit of code that takes a class object, reflects over its public methods, and writes a text file that’s the definition of an interface that the class implements.

    However, it’s a bit more work to decide WHICH methods belong on an interface (e.g. a class may implement more than one, right?) and to add the correct notation to the class’s source code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 120k
  • Answers 120k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Seen as one operation new is generally the slowest thing… May 12, 2026 at 12:16 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer How about something like: text = "unkowntext60moreunknowntext25something" @width, @height =… May 12, 2026 at 12:16 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Minimalistic XSLT 1.0 approach: <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > <xsl:output method="text"… May 12, 2026 at 12:16 am

Related Questions

I'm a big fan of the xUnit.NET framework; I find it light, simple, clean,
Let say I have a class like this: public sealed class Foo { public
So, let's say I have this code (VB.Net): Sub Main() dim xxx as string
This is something that I have never fully grasped in .NET as to the

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.