Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 289289
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:53:37+00:00 2026-05-12T05:53:37+00:00

Say I have a table with a primary key a_id and foreign key b_id

  • 0

Say I have a table with a primary key a_id and foreign key b_id.

It is important that a_id and b_id never intersect, i.e. it should never be the case that there exists an a_id = b_id.

What would be the best way to implement this? Could I somehow do this on the database end (mySql), or should this be ensured programmatically? If I ensure this programmatically, is it bad practice to insert a number for a primary key (rather than have the database autoincrement it)? I assume I would just create a routine that checks the latest primary key and simply increments it (and I would also need to ensure that the range of a_id never intersects the range of b_id). Any suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:53:37+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:53 am

    You could create another table that has the auto-increment field. Upon insertion of a record, it would insert into that “key table” and use the referenced values there. So if you have two globally unique keys in one table each insert would be two key inserts. This solution would scale beyond 2 as well.

    But I have to ask: Why?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let say I have the following desire, to simplify the IConvertible's to allow me
There doesn't seem to be any tried and true set of best practices to
(please excuse that I didn't use aliases). I would like my query output to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.