Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7759695
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T13:41:48+00:00 2026-06-01T13:41:48+00:00

Say I have a template function in namespace A. I also have another namespace

  • 0

Say I have a template function in namespace A. I also have another namespace B. There is a template function declared in namespace A, which is defined as

template<typename T, typename U>
void f(T a, U b);

Now in namespace B, I would want to declare a specialized type of the template function. I was thinking if I could typedef the template function so it is declared in namespace B as

void f(int a, double b);

without actually implementing the function calling the template function. As there is a way to declare new typenames with specific template parameters, shouldn’t there be a way to do that with functions aswell?
I tried different methods to achieve it, but it didn’t quite work out.

So is there already a way in C++ to redeclare the function with given template parameters without actually implementing a new function? If not, is it somehow achievable in C++11?

It would be a neat feature to have since it would make the purpose of the function more clear and would be syntactically better 🙂

Edit: So one could write:

using A::f<int, double>;

in B namespace and the function would show up with those template parameters

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T13:41:51+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 1:41 pm

    You can use using:

    namespace A {
        template <typename T> void f(T);
        template <> void f<int>(int);    // specialization
    }
    
    namespace B {
        using ::A::f;
    }
    

    You can’t distinguish between the specializations like that (since using is only about names), but it should be enough to make the desired specialization visible.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have the following template function: template <class T> void apply(const vector<complex<T> >&
Say I have a templated Action template <class ArgT> struct Action { Action(::boost::function< void(ArgT)
Say I have this: template<typename T, int X> class foo { public: void set(const
Say I have a templated class: template <typename T> class foo { void do_someting(T
Say I have a template which displays a view based on a property: {{#if
Lets say you have simple template function (not class member for the sake of
Let's say I have the following snippet: template <class T> void f(T arg) {
I have the following template template<typename T> void f(T t) { } And I
Lets say I have a function which takes a function pointer as a parameter,
If I have a template function, say one that calculates an average by summing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.