Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 425559
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T19:23:30+00:00 2026-05-12T19:23:30+00:00

Say I have the following function: foo <- function(x, y = min(m)) { m

  • 0

Say I have the following function:

foo <- function(x, y = min(m)) {
    m <- 1:10
    x + y
}

When I run foo(1), the returned value is 2, as expected. However, I cannot run foo(1, y = max(m)) and receive 11, since lazy evaluation only works for default arguments. How can I supply an argument but have it evaluate lazily?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T19:23:31+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:23 pm

    The simple answer is that you can’t and shouldn’t try to. That breaks scope and could wreak havoc if it were allowed. There are a few options that you can think about the problem differently.

    first pass y as a function

    foo<-function(x,y=min){
    m<-1:10
    x+y(m)
    }
    

    if a simple function does not work you can move m to an argument with a default.

    foo<-function(x,y=min(m),m=1:10){
    x+y(m)
    }
    

    Since this is a toy example I would assume that this would be too trivial. If you insist on breaking scope then you can pass it as an expression that is evaluated explicitly.

    foo<-function(x,y=expression(min(m))){
    m<-1:10
    x+eval(y)
    }
    

    Then there is the option of returning a function from another function. And that might work for you as well, depending on your purpose.

    bar<-function(f)function(x,y=f(m)){
    m<-1:10
    x+y
    }
    foo.min<-bar(min)
    foo.min(1)  #2
    foo.max<-bar(max)
    foo.max(1)  #10
    

    But now we are starting to get into the ridiculous.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 222k
  • Answers 222k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Activate the output buffer, include the file and then check… May 13, 2026 at 12:28 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try this to call your event with empty parameters :… May 13, 2026 at 12:28 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer did exactly that, for MS SQL Server 2005 ;) var… May 13, 2026 at 12:28 am

Related Questions

Lets say I have the following code. double *return_array(void) { double foo[2]; foo[0] =
Say I have the following string: I am the most foo h4ck3r ever!! I'm
I understand that const_cast to remove constness of objects is bad, I have the
I have a web form that contains lots of JavaScript functionalities to manipulate the

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.