Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6991507
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T19:30:44+00:00 2026-05-27T19:30:44+00:00

Say I have the following generic class: public class Foo<T extends Bar> { //

  • 0

Say I have the following generic class:

public class Foo<T extends Bar> {
   // stuff
}

Is it possible to specify a default type(Baz, for instance), which would act as T if no T were passed in?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T19:30:44+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 7:30 pm

    No. See “Type Variables” in the Java Language Specification.

    That said, you can provide subclasses which accomplish a similar purpose:

    public class Foo<T extends Bar> { ... }
    
    public class FooDefault extends Foo< Baz > { ... }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have the following class MyComponent : IMyComponent { public MyComponent(int start_at) {...}
Let's say I have the following class definition : List<SomeClass>... public class SomeClass {
Let's say I have a Generic Repository class along the lines of the following:
Say I have the following Objective-C class: @interface Foo { int someNumber; NSString *someString;
I have a generic list of type Element , for example. public class Element
For simplicity's sake, lets say I have the following Abstract Base Controller Class: public
Say I have the following model: class Foo(models.Model): content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType) object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField()
Let's say we have following this: <p class=first>This is paragraph 1.</p> <p class=second>This is
Say we have the following method: private MyObject foo = new MyObject(); // and
Say I have the following string: I am the most foo h4ck3r ever!! I'm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.