Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8076963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T15:22:29+00:00 2026-06-05T15:22:29+00:00

Say I have this: private list<myClass> myCollection; Is there a programming idiom to shorten

  • 0

Say I have this:

private list<myClass> myCollection;

Is there a programming idiom to shorten this very common statement combination into a single statement? :

   if (myCollection == null)
      myCollection = new list<myCollection>();

   myCollection.Add(someInstanceOfMyClass);

The idiom could be described as “create if necessary, then add to it”

TIA.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T15:22:31+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 3:22 pm

    Why not simply create at declaration?:

    private readonly List<myClass> myCollection = new List<myCollection>(); 
    

    Instantiating a single list is not a time or memory consuming thing. (Might be different if you had thousands of these and wanted lazy instantiation).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

lets say I have my owndefined datatype like this: public class InformationType { private
Say I have this code - public interface ParentInterface1 { public List<? extends ChildInterface1>
Say I have this class: class myclass { public int Field1{ get; set; }
Lets say we have this JPA-annotated class, with a property of type List. This
Can eclipse do this refactoring? Say I have a class that has a List:
Say I have this class: //Awesome.h class Awesome { public: Awesome(); private: membertype member;
Say I have the following Hibernate-mapped class: public class ClassA { @OneToMany(fetch=EAGER) private List<ClassB>
Let's say I have a class like this : public class MyClass { public
So say I have this class: public class PositionList { private Position[] data =
Lets say have this immutable record type: public class Record { public Record(int x,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.