Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8705173
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T03:17:37+00:00 2026-06-13T03:17:37+00:00

Say I want to write some unit tests for the (!!) function. my_prop xs

  • 0

Say I want to write some unit tests for the (!!) function.

my_prop xs n = ...

I want to restrict n to only valid indexes and I know I could do something like

my_prop xs n = (not.null) (drop n xs) ==> ...

But this makes it so that the vast majority of the generated cases are invalid and get thrown away. Is there a way I can set things up so that QuickCheck generates the xs list first and uses its value to generate only valid cases of n?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T03:17:38+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 3:17 am

    Using forAll, you can specify a generator for n which depends on the earlier arguments, e.g.

    my_prop (NonEmpty xs) = forAll (choose (0, length xs - 1)) $ \n -> ...
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I want to write a function like this: int get_some_int(string index) { ...perform
I want to write some tests for views in a Django profile app. The
I'm trying to write some unit tests for Command object validations. When my command
Let's say I want to write a Sudoku solver with some representational abstraction using
Lets say I want to write an AJAX chat box, just something simple, I
Lets say I want to write an inline assembly function in a c++ code
Let's say I want to write a poker app for Android. It is fine
I want to write a program that would take a string, let's say Fox
I want to write a simple applet to put in a tray. Let's say
Let's say there are two python scripts that want to write data to the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.