Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8920855
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T06:23:00+00:00 2026-06-15T06:23:00+00:00

Say process 1 has allocated some space with VirtualAlloc in a function and the

  • 0

Say process 1 has allocated some space with VirtualAlloc in a function and the function already returned at that time. Is it possible that a second process frees the space with VirtualFreeEx if it knows the right address(es)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T06:23:01+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 6:23 am

    The answer to this question is yes.

    Memory is owned by the process in which it resides. It is not owned by the process which allocated it.

    In many ways, this is similar to calling malloc from one thread and then free from another. That’s perfectly fine. And it’s perfectly fine to do the equivalent with VirtualAllocEx and VirtualFreeEx.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I understand that each process has its own address space allocated by the Operating
Let's say I want to implement a function that is supposed to process an
Say I have a data file that I want to process; I want to
Lets say that I'm trying to create a new process with the following code:
Let's say you had an external process writing files to some directory, and you
I need to kill windows explorer's process (explorer.exe), for that lets say i use
I understand that a user can own a process and each process has an
Let's say I have to read from a directory that has many large XML
Consider there are 2 process and each process has 2 thread...say..A , B (first
I need to process data that has a set of attributes where the number

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.