Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 697573
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T03:10:55+00:00 2026-05-14T03:10:55+00:00

Say we want to compile a large project (say GCC or the Linux kernel)

  • 0

Say we want to compile a large project (say GCC or the Linux kernel) as fast as possible. Does a CPU with hyperthreading capability (say an Intel Core i7) run the compiler any faster with hyperthreading enabled or disabled? Are there any published benchmarks that test this?

My understanding of hyperthreading is that each core can select instructions from two (or more processes). This usually makes the core more efficient since it’s less likely that functional units will be idle. However, there’s potential for a performance penalty since processes running on the same core share resources such as cache and may interfere with one another. Whether or not performance actually increases depends on the workload.

So for a compiler workload, does performance increase? If so, by how much?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T03:10:56+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:10 am

    Compiling coreutils-8.4 on Ubuntu 8.04 x86

    Intel Atom 1.6 GHz with HT enabled:

    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make > /dev/null
    
    real    2m33.375s
    user    2m22.873s
    sys     0m10.541s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make -j2 > /dev/null
    
    real    1m54.707s
    user    3m26.121s
    sys     0m13.821s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make > /dev/null
    
    real    2m33.372s
    user    2m22.753s
    sys     0m10.657s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make -j2 > /dev/null
    
    real    1m54.851s
    user    3m26.145s
    sys     0m13.685s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$
    

    So Hyper-Threading reduces the run time to 75%, which is equivalent to 33% more processing power. (I ran them twice to ensure that everything is in the memory cache.)

    And here is a control experiment to show that make -j2 alone does not improve the speed for compiling coreutils-8.4 on Ubuntu 8.04 x86

    Single-core Core 2 Quad 2.5 GHz VM (no HT):

    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make > /dev/null
    
    real    0m44.453s
    user    0m38.870s
    sys     0m5.500s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make -j2 > /dev/null
    
    real    0m45.131s
    user    0m40.450s
    sys     0m4.580s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make > /dev/null
    
    real    0m44.621s
    user    0m39.090s
    sys     0m5.340s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ make clean > /dev/null
    ~/coreutils-8.4$ time make -j2 > /dev/null
    
    real    0m45.165s
    user    0m40.390s
    sys     0m4.610s
    ~/coreutils-8.4$
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say you want a simple maze on an N by M grid, with one
Say you want to generate a matched list of identifiers and strings enum {
Say I want to copy the contents of a directory excluding files and folders
Say I want to create vb.net application in Visual studio 2005. What is the
Say I want to get the HTML of http://www.google.com as a String using some
Say I want to design a database for a community site with blogs, photos,
Say I want to check if a record in a MySQL table exists. I'd
Say I want to have a method that takes any kind of number, is
Say I want to manipulate some files on a floppy drive or a USB
I have been looking into MeeGo, maemo, Android architecture. They all have Linux Kernel,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.