Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6653881
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T01:19:26+00:00 2026-05-26T01:19:26+00:00

Say you have a branch on your origin that has a ridiculously long name…

  • 0

Say you have a branch on your origin that has a ridiculously long name…

$> git branch -a
* master
  origin/master
  origin/branch-with-a-ridiculously-long-name

And when you work on that branch locally, you want to give it a less ridiculous name, like bob.

$> git checkout origin/branch-with-a-ridiculously-long-name
$> git checkout -b bob
$> git branch --set-upstream bob origin/branch-with-a-ridiculously-long-name

When it comes time to push, what can you do such that if you run:

$> git checkout bob
$> git push

then any local changes on “bob” will be sent to the “branch-with-a-ridiculously-long-name”, and won’t create a new branch on origin called “bob”?

I’m effectively after a way of making git push implicitly expand in to git push origin bob:branch-with-a-ridiculously-long-name.

I think setting git config push.default upstream goes part of the way, but I’m not sure how to deal with the fact that the local branch’s name differs from the remote.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T01:19:27+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:19 am

    If you set push.default to upstream (or tracking in versions of git before 1.7.4.2), that should do exactly what you want when you run:

       git push
    

    … or:

       git push origin
    

    The git branch --set-upstream command that you ran, in combination with the config setting, should make that work.

    I wrote a post about this unfortunate asymmetry between git push and git pull.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have a branch named feature that has been branched off master .
Say I have a command that looks as follows: git checkout -b my-branch origin/dev
Say I have a project in a git repository. The project has a branch
Say I have a branch work and a branch ideas in my git repository.
So say I have my master branch, and I create feature-x branch to work
,Let's say I have a master Git branch and a feature branch off of
let's say I have the following config file [branch master] remote = origin merge
Let's say I have a class Tree that has zero or more Branches, and
Say I have 100 commits in my branch that I've been working on for
Say I have a branch A, and from that I branch B. I make

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.