Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 225661
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:26:07+00:00 2026-05-11T19:26:07+00:00

Say you want to share some resource, like a class or a variable across

  • 0

Say you want to share some resource, like a class or a variable across all threads/sessions within a ASP.NET web application. What is better?

1) A static variable having thread-safe accessors to that static variable?

2) Or a ASP.NET application session variable?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:26:07+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:26 pm

    If you only have one of those, there is little difference.

    If you have several, you should use static variables rather than Application variables. The Application.Lock method will lock all Application variables, while you can use separate syncronisition identifiers for your static variables, so that each lock only affects the code that accesses that specific variable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I want to write a function like this: int get_some_int(string index) { ...perform
Say I want to manipulate some files on a floppy drive or a USB
I believe svn externals is what I want to use but would like some
I want to share named register buffers across MacVim windows (as I would across
Let's say I have a class that implements the IDisposable interface. Something like this:
I'm not sure where to put some methods. Let's say I want to send
I want my application to reset shared preferences when the application reinstalling let's say
I want to pause the timer thread....or i can say want to put it
Say I want to draw a Ball in the scene and here are two
Say you want to install a library lib-a which has dependencies dep-1 and dep-2

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.