Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 918555
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T18:23:48+00:00 2026-05-15T18:23:48+00:00

scala> class A(implicit a: Int); defined class A scala> class B()(implicit a: Int); defined

  • 0
scala> class A(implicit a: Int);
defined class A

scala> class B()(implicit a: Int);
defined class B

scala> new A()(1)
res1: A = A@159d450

scala> new B()(1)
res2: B = B@171f735

scala> new A(1)
<console>:7: error: too many arguments for constructor A: ()(implicit a: Int)A
       new A(1)

Why does Scalac insert an empty parameter list before the implicit parameter list provided in the class declaration?

This seems to be a feature, not a bug, judging by the commentary in the scalac sources:

// convert (implicit … ) to
()(implicit … ) if its the only
parameter section

I’m curious to know why this is done. I find it rather surprising.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T18:23:49+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:23 pm

    The way I see it is that implicit parameter list does not replace the regular one(s). Since for constructor definitions at least one parameter list is needed, if nothing is indicated explicitly ‘()’ is generated.

    While this might be indeed puzzling, it’s in line with generating an empty constructor when no parameter lists at all are present.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 533k
  • Answers 533k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The result contains multiple rows (each table per row), try… May 17, 2026 at 12:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Processing.js is a script language interpreted by Javascript (interpreted, not… May 17, 2026 at 12:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could create a dependency property and then get the… May 17, 2026 at 12:32 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I am very new to Scala. I want to implement a generic matrix class
class Test { import scala.collection._ class Parent class Child extends Parent implicit val children
Consider the following Scala case class: case class WideLoad(a: String, b: Int, c: Float,
In Scala, if I define a method called apply in a class or a
I have a class that I would like to use in a scala.collection.mutable.PriorityQueue, but
In Scala 2.8 and liftweb.net 2.0 I'm trying to serialize a case-class to Json
If I have a small Scala class with a private field and public accessors:
I'm not sure why this doesn't work: scala> case class Loader(n: String, x: String,
I'm switching from scala 2.7 and ordered to scala 2.8 and using ordering. It
This simple test, of course, works as expected: scala> var b = 2 b:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.