Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6367279
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T00:31:42+00:00 2026-05-25T00:31:42+00:00

scala> val two = (1,2) two: (Int, Int) = (1,2) scala> val one =

  • 0
scala> val two = (1,2)
two: (Int, Int) = (1,2)

scala> val one = (1,)
<console>:1: error: illegal start of simple expression
       val one = (1,)
                    ^

scala> val zero = ()
zero: Unit = ()

Is this:

val one = Tuple1(5)

really the most concise way to write a singleton tuple literal in Scala? And does Unit work like an empty tuple?

Does this inconsistency bother anyone else?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T00:31:42+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 12:31 am

    really the most concise way to write a singleton tuple literal in Scala?

    Yes.

    And does Unit work like an empty tuple?

    No, since it does not implement Product.

    Does this inconsistency bother anyone else?

    Not me.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

val m = scala.collection.mutable.Map[String, Int]() // this doesn't work m += (foo, 2) //
scala> val l = List((1,2), (2,3)) l: List[(Int, Int)] = List((1,2), (2,3)) I can
scala> val m = Map(1 -> 2) m: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Int] = Map(1 -> 2) scala>
In Scala, if I have a simple class as follows: val calc = actor
While playing around with regexps in Scala I wrote something like this: scala> val
Using Scala's command line REPL: def foo(x: Int): Unit = {} def foo(x: String):
I have two packrat parsers in scala: val symbols : PackratParser[String] = { |
Given the following Scala List: val l = List(List(a1, b1, c1), List(a2, b2, c2),
I am generating the scala AST using the following code: val setting = new
What use is the division operator on a scala BigDecimal ? val d1 =

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.