Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 49963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:31:08+00:00 2026-05-10T16:31:08+00:00

Seeing as Java doesn’t have nullable types, nor does it have a TryParse(), how

  • 0

Seeing as Java doesn’t have nullable types, nor does it have a TryParse(), how do you handle input validation without throwing an exceptions?

The usual way:

String userdata = /*value from gui*/ int val; try {    val = Integer.parseInt(userdata); } catch (NumberFormatException nfe) {    // bad data - set to sentinel    val = Integer.MIN_VALUE; } 

I could use a regex to check if it’s parseable, but that seems like a lot of overhead as well.

What’s the best practice for handling this situation?

EDIT: Rationale: There’s been a lot of talk on SO about exception handling, and the general attitude is that exceptions should be used for unexpected scenarios only. However, I think bad user input is EXPECTED, not rare. Yes, it really is an academic point.

Further Edits:

Some of the answers demonstrate exactly what is wrong with SO. You ignore the question being asked, and answer another question that has nothing to do with it. The question isn’t asking about transition between layers. The question isn’t asking what to return if the number is un-parseable. For all you know, val = Integer.MIN_VALUE; is exactly the right option for the application that this completely context free code snippet was take from.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:31:09+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:31 pm

    That’s pretty much it, although returning MIN_VALUE is kind of questionable, unless you’re sure it’s the right thing to use for what you’re essentially using as an error code. At the very least I’d document the error code behavior, though.

    Might also be useful (depending on the application) to log the bad input so you can trace.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 119k
  • Answers 119k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Not sure what your question here is...but you could create… May 11, 2026 at 11:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you mean using a literal, you simply have to… May 11, 2026 at 11:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Model.create(...) works fine for me. It's probably worth using Model.create!… May 11, 2026 at 11:43 pm

Related Questions

Seeing as Java doesn't have nullable types, nor does it have a TryParse(), how
I'm working with JInternalFrame's under Mac OS X Java 5 and when maximizing a
I'm currently working on cross-platform applications and was just curious as to how other
Seeing something strange between a Java web service and the .NET client talking to
Edit: This code is fine. I found a logic bug somewhere that doesn't exist

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.