Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 587307
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:11:56+00:00 2026-05-13T15:11:56+00:00

Seems to me that File.Exists() is much slower when the file does not exist

  • 0

Seems to me that File.Exists() is much slower when the file does not exist or the user doesn’t have access than when the file does exist.

is this true?

This doesn’t make sense to me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:11:56+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:11 pm

    Generally when you search a bunch of stuff for something, you can’t be sure about their lack of existence unless you have searched all possible places it could have been. When searching for something (in most kinds of collections) the worst case is when the item doesn’t exist in the collection.

    I have not benchmarked File.Exists in particular but I highly doubt that there’s a really noticeable difference in those cases unless you’re doing it thousands of times. How did you reach to this conclusion?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm still working on a particular RDF file, but seems that something is not
I have a xsl file that is grabbing variables from xml and they seem
Seems that requirements on safety do not seem to like systems that use AI
It seems that Silverlight/WPF are the long term future for user interface development with
It seems that a List object cannot be stored in a List variable in
It seems that it is impossible to capture the keyboard event normally used for
It seems that most of the installers for Perl are centered around installing Perl
It seems that anyone can snoop on incoming/outgoing .NET web service SOAP messages just
It seems that C# 3 hit me without me even noticing, could you guys
It seems that when I use a tool (such as winmerge) to update my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.