Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9011845
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T02:50:55+00:00 2026-06-16T02:50:55+00:00

ServiceStack services are great for responding with the content type that’s requested in the

  • 0

ServiceStack services are great for responding with the content type that’s requested in the Accept header. But if I need to close/end the response early from within a request filter, is there a way to respond with the proper content type? All I have access to in a request filter is the raw IHttpResponse so it seems to me that the only option is to tediously, manually check the Accept header and do a bunch of switch/case statements to figure out which serializer to use and then write directly to the response.OutputStream.

To further illustrate the question, in a normal service method you can do something like this:

public object Get(FooRequest request)
{
    return new FooResponseObject()
    {
        Prop1 = "oh hai!"
    }
}

And ServiceStack will figure out what content type to use and which serializer to use. Is there anything similar to this that I can do within a request filter?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T02:50:57+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 2:50 am

    ServiceStack pre-calculates the Requested Content-Type on a number of factors (e.g. Accept: header, QueryString, etc) it stores this info in the httpReq.ResponseContentType property.

    You can use this along with the IAppHost.ContentTypeFilters registry which stores a collection of all Registered Content-Type serializers in ServiceStack (i.e. built-in + Custom) and do something like:

    var dto = ...;
    var contentType = httpReq.ResponseContentType;
    var serializer = EndpointHost.AppHost
        .ContentTypeFilters.GetResponseSerializer(contentType);
    
    if (serializer == null)
       throw new Exception("Content-Type {0} does not exist".Fmt(contentType));
    
    var serializationContext = new HttpRequestContext(httpReq, httpRes, dto);
    serializer(serializationContext, dto, httpRes);
    httpRes.EndServiceStackRequest(); //stops further execution of this request
    

    Note: this just serializes the Response to the Output stream, it does not execute any other Request or Response filters or other user-defined hooks as per a normal ServiceStack request.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm using ServiceStack with great results so far, except that dealing with errors is
ServiceStack modules are so interesting. Iplugin interface also so good for Rest services. But
I have the following configuration. <location path=services> <system.web> <httpHandlers> <add path=* type=ServiceStack.WebHost.Endpoints.ServiceStackHttpHandlerFactory, ServiceStack verb=*
On OnDelete of ServiceStack, it is called but the values are empty. I tried
I'm looking for at using ServiceStack for the services part of a web application
What I basically need is a small console application that listens on port 80
I have been tinkering around with ServiceStack to expose some web services and have
I'm connecting to a service using ServiceStack that I have no control on: I
Is there any mechanism in ServiceStack services to return streaming/large binary data? WCF's MTOM
Where I was I'm trying to convert some WCF services to use ServiceStack instead.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.