Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 675943
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:52:26+00:00 2026-05-14T00:52:26+00:00

Several databases I’ve been looking at recently implement a virtual machine internally to perform

  • 0

Several databases I’ve been looking at recently implement a virtual machine internally to perform the respective data reads and writes. For an example, check out this article on SQLite’s virtual machine they call the ‘VDBE’. I’m curious as to what the benefits of such an architecture are. I would assume performance is one but why would a virtual machine like this run faster? In fact, it seems to be that this extra layer could cause it to run slower. So perhaps it’s for security? Or portability? Anyway, just curious about this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:52:26+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:52 am

    They do their stuff at the “assembly-like” level, where you gain acceptable speed without losing portability. I think they provide a virtual machine so they get a balanced trade off. Either you execute the high level code(SQL code**) as a high level language and you lose speed but you gain convenience. The other way is to produce Platform-Specific(Native) code which is going to run much faster compared to the interpreted but it is a lot of hassle for a wide-spread library which runs where ANSI-C exists.

    ** It doesn’t have to be SQL-code of course. I think that an imperative representation is much better suited for execution. Anyway, that representation still is a very high level representation compared to “opcode”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've made a Service that reads in several databases and load it in to
I have a ~23000 line SQL dump containing several databases worth of data. I
I have several databases (SqlServer 2005) on the same server with the same schema
We are upgrading/converting several old Access databases to MS-SQL. Many of these databases have
At work, we have several applications with databases in a centralized SQL server. Whenever
I need to write some data in several database. I choose sqlapi.com I have
I have several databases in my sql server in which some of them I
I've several databases that contains the exact same base tables with identical design. Now
When doing a query over several databases in SQL server (2005+) I find it
I need a universal way to store dates and datetimes in several databases (for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.